Recurrent magnetic storms of January 2—8, 2015
Heading:
| 1Chernogor, LF, Luo, Y 1V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine |
| Kinemat. fiz. nebesnyh tel (Online) 2026, 42(1):16-36 |
| https://doi.org/10.15407/kfnt2026.01.016 |
| Language: Ukrainian |
Abstract: Solar storms, accompanied by flares, coronal mass ejections, and the generation of high-speed solar wind streams, cause a set of physical processes in the geospace environment and on Earth. The collective manifestation of these processes is referred to as a geospace storm. Geospace storms are associated with intense disturbances of the geomagnetic field, the ionosphere, the upper atmosphere (thermosphere), the geoelectric field of magnetospheric-ionospheric-atmospheric origin, the troposphere, and telluric currents. All these disturbances are closely interconnected. Therefore, a geospace storm can be understood as a synergistically interacting system of magnetic, ionospheric, atmospheric, and electrical storms. Every geospace storm is a unique phenomenon. In addition to general patterns, each storm has its own individual characteristics. For this reason, the study of each new storm remains a relevant scientific task. An interesting event occurred in early January 2015, a recurrent sequence of three geomagnetic storms over the course of one week. The purpose of this study is to describe the features of fluctuations in the level and spectral composition of the geomagnetic field during these three successive storms from January 2 to 8, 2015. The core of the magnetometric system located at the magnetometric observatory of the V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (geographic coordinates: 49.65°N, 36.93°E) is the IM-II induction magnetometer-fluxmeter. It offers high sensitivity (0.5...500 pT for periods of 1...1000 s, respectively). The signal output from the magnetometer, initially in relative units and accounting for the instrument’s amplitude-frequency characteristics, is first converted into absolute units (in nanoteslas). Time series of the amplitudes of the horizontal components of the geomagnetic field are then constructed. Subsequently, a system spectral analysis is performed across the period range of 1...1000 s. Analysis of the three recurrent geospace and magnetic storms observed near the maximum of the 24th solar activity cycle revealed the following. During January 2/3, 4/5, and 7/8, 2015, severe magnetospheric storms occurred, with corresponding powers of 180, 240, and 530 GJ/s and energies of approximately 1920, 4800, and 10500 TJ, respectively. The magnetic storms during January 2/3, 4/5, and 7/8, 2015, were classified as rather moderate, moderate, and strong, with associated energies of 2.5, 3.1, and 4.9 PJ, and power P1 of about 200, 50, and 600 GW. Simultaneously, the P2 power reached 32, 12, and 23 GW, respectively. During January 2/3, 4/5, and 7/8, 2015, the fluctuation level of the horizontal components of the geomagnetic field increased from 0.5 nT by factors of approximately 4...5, 2...3, and 8...10, respectively. These increases correlated with the average power of the geomagnetic storm during its main phase. During the magnetic storms, fluctuations in the geomagnetic field were dominated by components with periods of 700...1000 s. Oscillations with periods of 140...200 s had slightly lower amplitudes, and those with periods of 40...50 s were the weakest. The three consecutive magnetic storms, occurring near the solar activity maximum, were classified as rather moderate, moderate, and strong. |
| Keywords: geospace storm, magnetic storm, spectral composition of geomagnetic field fluctuations, storm energetics, storm type |
References:
1. Adushkin V. V., Spivak A. A., Rybnov Y. S., Riabova S. A., Soloviev S. P., Tikhonova A. V., (2023). Disturbance of geophysical fields and the ionosphere during a strong geomagnetic storm on April 23, 2023. Dokl. Earth Sci., 512, 1039-1043.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X23601542
2. Blagoveshchensky D. V. (2018). Comparison of ionospheric parameters during similar geomagnetic storms. Geomagn. Aeron., 58(2), 207-213.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793218020032
3. Blagoveshchensky D. V. (2020). Effects of geomagnetic storms in the low-latitude ionosphere. Cosmic Res., 58(4), 234-241.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952520040024
4. Blagoveshchensky D. V., Sergeeva M. A. (2019). Impact of geomagnetic storm of September 7/8, 2017 on ionosphere and HF propagation: A multi-instrument study. Adv. Space Res., 63(1), 239-256.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.07.016
5. Buonsanto M. J. (1999). Ionospheric storms - a review. Space Sci. Rev., 88, 563-601.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005107532631
6. Chernogor L. F. (2008). Advanced methods of spectral analysis of quasiperiodic wave-like processes in the ionosphere: Specific features and experimental results. Geomagn. Aeron., 48(5), 652-673.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208050101
7. Chernogor L. F. (2021). Physics of geospace storms. Space Sci. Tech., 27(1), 3-77.
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2021.01.003
8. Chernogor L. F. (2021). Statistical characteristics of geomagnetic storms in the 24th cycle of solar activity. Space Sci. Tech., 37(4), 49-59.
https://doi.org/10.15407/kfnt2021.04.049
9. Chernogor L. F. (2025). Energetics of the geospace storm of April 23-24, 2023: from solar storm to lithospheric disturbance. Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies, 41, 97-107.
https://doi.org/10.3103/S088459132503002X
10. Chernogor L. F. (2025). Energetics of physical processes operated on May 8-12, 2024: From the solar storm to lithospheric disturbances. Adv. Space Res., 75(6), 4825-4849.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.12.069
11. Chernogor L. F., Domnin I. F. (2014). Physics of geospace storms. Kharkiv: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Publ. [in Russian].
12. Chernogor L. F., Garmash K. P., Guo Q., Luo Y., Rozumenko V. T., Zheng Y. (2020). Ionospheric storm effects over the People's Republic of China on 14 May 2019: Results from multipath multi-frequency oblique radio sounding. Adv. Space Res., 66(2), 226-242.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.03.037
13. Chernogor L. F., Garmash K. P., Guo Q., Zheng Y. (2021). Effects of the strong ionospheric storm of August 26, 2018: Results of multipath radiophysical monitoring. Geomagn. Aeron., 61(1), 73-91.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679322006002X
14. Chernogor L. F., Garmash K. P., Podnos V. A., Tyrnov O. F. (2013). The V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Radio physical Observatory - the tool for ionosphere monitoring in space experiments. Space Project "Ionosat-Micro". Kyiv: Academ¬periodika, 160-182. [in Russian].
15. Chernogor L. F., Golub M. Yu., Luo Y., Tsymbal A. M., Shevelev M. B. (2021). Variations in the geomagnetic field that accompanied the 10 June 2021 solar eclipse. Bull. Karazin Kharkov Nat. Univ. Radiophys. and Electronics Ser., 34, 55-69. [In Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.26565/2311-0872-2021-34-07
16. Crowley G., Azeem I. (2018). Extreme ionospheric storms and their effects on GPS systems. Extreme Events in Geospace: Origins, Predictability, and Consequences, 555-586.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812700-1.00023-6
17. D'Angelo G., Piersanti M., Alfonsi L., Spogli L., Clausen L. B. N., Coco I., Li G., Baiqi N. (2018). The response of high latitude ionosphere to the 2015 St. Patrick's day storm from in situ and ground based observations. Adv. Space Res., 62(3), 638-650. D
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.005
18. Danilov A. D. (2013). F2-region response to geomagnetic disturbances (review). Geliogeofiz. Issled., 5, 1-33. [In Russian].
19. Danilov A. D., Lastovika J. (2001). Effects of geomagnetic storms on the ionosphere and atmosphere. Int. J. Geomagn. Aeron., 2(3), 209-224.
20. Danilov A. D., Morozova L. D. (1985). Ionospheric storms in the F2 region. Morphology and physics (review). Geomagn. Aeron., 25(5), 705-721. [in Russian].
21. Deminov M. G., Belov A. V., Nepomnyashchaya E. V., Obridko V. N. (2018). Parameters of the geomagnetic activity, thermosphere, and ionosphere for the ultimately intense magnetic storm. Geomagn. Aeron., 58(4), 501-508.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793218040059
22. Despirak I. V., Kleimenova N. G., Gromova L. I., Gromov S. V., Malysheva L. M. (2020). Supersubstorms during storms of September 7/8, 2017. Geomagn. Aeron., 60(3), 292-300.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793220030044
23. Dmitriev A. (2018). Spatial characteristics of recurrent ionospheric storms at low latitudes during solar minimum. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 179, 553-561.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.09.013
24. Dmitriev A. V., Suvorova A. V., Klimenko M. V., Klimenko V. V., Ratovsky K. G., Rakhmatulin R. A., Parkhomov V. A. (2017). Predictable and unpredictable ionospheric disturbances during St. Patrick's Day magnetic storms of 2013 and 2015 and on 8-9 March 2008. J. Geophys. Res., 122(2), 2398-2423.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023260
25. Fejer B. G., Navarro L. A., Sazykin S., Newheart A., Milla M. A., Condor P. (2021). Prompt penetration and substorm effects over Jicamarca during the September 2017 geomagnetic storm. J. Geophys. Res., 126(8), e2021JA029651.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029651
26. Feng J., Zhou Y., Zhou Y., Gao S., Zhou C., Tang Q., Liu Y. (2021). Ionospheric response to the 17 March and 22 June 2015 geomagnetic storms over Wuhan region using GNSS-based tomographic technique. Adv. Space Res., 67(1), 111-121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.10.008
27. Ghodpage R. N., Patil P. T., Gurav O. B., Gurubaran S., Sharma A. K. (2018). Ionospheric response to major storm of 17th March 2015 using multi-instrument data over low latitude station Kolhapur (16.8°N, 74.2°E, 10.6°dip. Lat.). Adv. Space Res., 62(3), 624-637.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.003
28. Gonzalez W. D., Jozelyn J. A., Kamide Y., Kroehl H. W., Rostoker G., Tsurutani B. T., Vasyliunas V. M. (1994). What is a geomagnetic storm? J. Geophys. Res., 99(A4), 5771-5792.
https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02867
29. Guo Q., Zheng Y. Chernogor L. F., Garmash K. P., Rozumenko V. T. (2021). Ionospheric processes observed with the passive oblique-incidence HF Doppler radar. Bull. Karazin Kharkov Nat. Univ. Radiophys. and Electronics Ser., 30, 3-15.
https://doi.org/10.26565/2311-0872-2019-30-01
30. Hayakawa H., Ebihara Y., Mishev A., Koldobskiy S., Kusano K., Bechet S., Yashiro S., Iwai K., Shinbori A., Mursula K., Miyake F., Shiota D., Silveira M., Stuart R., Oliveira D., Akiyama S., Ohnishi K., Miyoshi Y. (2024). The solar and geomagnetic storms in May 2024: A flash data report. Astrophys. J. 979(1).
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9335
31. Imtiaz N., Younas W., Khan M. (2020). Response of the low-to mid-latitude ionosphere to the geomagnetic storm of September 2017. Ann. Geophys., 38(2), 359-372. DOI: 10.5194/angeo-38-359-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-359-2020
32. Jiang C., Yang G., Liu J., Yokoyama T., Liu T., Lan T., Zhou C., Zhang Y., Zhao Z., Komolmis T., Supnithi P., Yatini C. Y. (2017). Equatorial and low-latitude ionospheric response to the 17-18 March 2015 great storm over South East Asia longitude sector. J. Geophys. Res., 122(5), 5756-5767.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024134
33. Jimoh O., Lei J., Zhong J., Owolabi C., Luan X., Dou X. (2019). Topside ionospheric conditions during the 7/8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm. J. Geophys. Res., 124(11), 9381-9404.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026590
34. Jin S., Jin R., Kutoglu H. (2017). Positive and negative ionospheric responses to the March 2015 geomagnetic storm from BDS observations. J. Geodes., 91(6), 613-626.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0988-4
35. Jonah O. F., Coster A., Zhang S., Goncharenko L., Erickson P. J., de Paula E. R., Kherani E. A. (2018). TID observations and source analysis during the 2017 Memorial Day Weekend Geomagnetic Storm over North America. J. Geophys. Res., 123(10), 8749-8765.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025367
36. Karan D. K., Martinis C. R., Daniell R. E., Eastes R. W., Wang W., McClintock W. E., Michell R. G., England S. (2024). GOLD observations of the merging of the Southern Crest of the equatorial ionization anomaly and aurora during the 10 and 11 May 2024 Mother's Day super geomagnetic storm. Geophys. Res. Lett., 51(15), e2024GL110632.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110632
37. Kruparova O., Krupar V., Szabo A., Lario D., Nieves-Chinchilla T., Oliveros J. C. M. (2024). Unveiling the Interplanetary Solar Radio Bursts of the 2024 Mother's Day Solar Storm. Astrophys. J. Lett., 970(L13), 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad5da6
38. Kumar S., Kumar V. V. (2019). Ionospheric response to the St. Patrick's Day space weather events in March 2012, 2013, and 2015 at southern low and middle latitudes. J. Geophys. Res., 124(1), 584-602.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025674
39. Kumar V. V., Parkinson M. L. (2017). A global scale picture of ionospheric peak electron density changes during geomagnetic storms. Space Weather, 15(4), 637-652.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001573
40. Lai P. C., Burke W. J. (2019). Morphologies of the topside ionosphere observed by COSMIC at high-latitudes during the 17 March 2013 magnetic storm. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 193, 105084.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105084
41. Lei J., Huang F., Chen X., Zhong J., Ren D., Wang W., Yue X., Luan X., Jia M., Dou X., Hu L., Ning B., Owolabi C., Chen J., Li G., Xue X. (2018). Was magnetic storm the only driver of the long-duration enhancements of daytime total electron content in the Asian-Australian sector between 7 and 12 September 2017? J. Geophys. Res., 123(4), 3217-3232.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JA025166
42. Li S. (2021). Temporal evolution analysis of storm-enhanced density during an intense magnetic storm on March 2015. Adv. Space Res., 67(5), 1570-1579.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.12.004
43. Liu G., Shen H. (2017). A severe negative response of the ionosphere to the intense geomagnetic storm on March 17, 2015 observed at mid- and low-latitude stations in the China zone. Adv. Space Res., 59(9), 2301-2312.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.021
44. Liu J., Zhang D.-H., Coster A. J., Zhang S.-R., Ma G.-Y., Hao Y.-Q., Xiao Z. (2019). A case study of the large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances in the eastern Asian sector during the 2015 St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm. Ann. Geophys., 37(4), 673-687.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-673-2019
45. Liu W., Xu L., Xiong C., Xu J. (2017). The ionospheric storms in the American sector and their longitudinal dependence at the northern middle latitudes. Adv. Space Res., 59(2), 603-613.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.10.032
46. Luo Y., Chernogor L. F., Garmash K. P., Guo Q., Rozumenko V. T., Zheng Yu. (2021). Dynamic processes in the magnetic field and in the ionosphere during the 30 August 2 September, 2019 geospace storm. Ann. Geophys., 39(4), 657-685.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-657-2021
47. Luo Y., Guo Q., Zheng Y., Garmash K. P., Chernogor L. F., Shulga S. M. (2021). Geospace storm effects on August 5/6, 2019. Space Sci. and Tech., 27(2), 45-69. [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2021.02.045
48. Mannucci A. J., Tsurutani B. T. (2018). Ionosphere and thermosphere responses to extreme geomagnetic storms. Extreme Events in Geospace: Origins, Predictability, and Consequences, 493-511.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812700-1.00020-0
49. Moro J., Xu J., Denardini C. M., Resende L. C. A., Neto P. F. B., Da Silva L. A., Silva R. P., Chen S. S., Picanзo G. A. S., Carmo C. S., Liu Z., Yan C., Wang C., Schuch N. J. (2021). First look at a geomagnetic storm with Santa Maria digisonde data: F region responses and comparisons over the American sector. J. Geophys. Res., 126(1), e2020JA028663.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028663
50. Ngwira C. M., Habarulema J.-B., Astafyeva E., Yizengaw E., Jonah O. F., Crowley G., Gisler A., Coffey V. (2019). Dynamic response of ionospheric plasma density to the geomagnetic storm of 22-23 June 2015. J. Geophys. Res., 124(8), 7123-7139.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026172
51. Nykiel G., Zanimonskiy Y. M., Yampolski Yu. M., Figurski M. (2017). Efficient usage of dense GNSS networks in central Europe for the visualization and investigation of ionospheric TEC variations. Sensors, 17(10), 2298.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102298
52. Olwendo O. J., Cesaroni C., Yamazaki Y., Cilliers P. (2017). Equatorial ionospheric disturbances over the East African sector during the 2015 St. Patrick's day storm. Adv. Space Res., 60(8), 1817-1826.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.037
53. Paul B., De B. K., Guha A. (2018). Latitudinal variation of F-region ionospheric response during three strongest geomagnetic storms of 2015. Acta Geod. Geophys., 53(4), 579-606.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-018-0221-4
54. Peddi Naidu P., Latha T. M., Devi M. I. (2019). Influence of geomagnetic storms on ionospheric F2-layer at low and mid latitudes in 300° E meridian. Geomagn. Aeron., 59(8), 995-1002.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793219080152
55. Piersanti M., Cesaroni C., Spogli L., Alberti T. (2017). Does TEC react to a sudden impulse as a whole? The 2015 Saint Patrick's day storm event. Adv. Space Res., 60(8), 1807-1816.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.021
56. Polekh N., Zolotukhina N., Kurkin V., Zherebtsov G., Shi J., Wang G., Wang Z. (2017). Dynamics of ionospheric disturbances during the 17-19 March 2015 geomagnetic storm over East Asia. Adv. Space Res., 60(11), 2464-2476.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.09.030
57. Qian L., Wang W., Burns A. G., Chamberlin P. C., Solomon S. C. (2020). Responses of the Thermosphere and Ionosphere System to Concurrent Solar Flares and Geomagnetic Storms. J. Geophys. Res., 125(3), e2019JA027431.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027431
58. Rajesh P. K., Lin C. H., Lin C. Y., Chen C. H., Liu J. Y., Matsuo T., Chen S. P., Yeh W. H., Huang C. Y. (2021). Extreme Positive Ionosphere Storm Triggered by a Minor Magnetic Storm in Deep Solar Minimum Revealed by FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2 and GNSS Observations. J. Geophys. Res., 126(2), e2020JA028261.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028261
59. Ray S., Roy B., Paul K. S., Goswami S., Oikonomou C., Haralambous H., Chandel B., Paul A. (2017). Study of the effect of 17-18 March 2015 geomagnetic storm on the Indian longitudes using GPS and C/NOFS. J. Geophys. Res., 122(2), 2551-2563.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023127
60. Rubtsov A. V., Maletckii B. M., Danilchuk E. I., Smotrova E. E., Shelkov A. D., Yasyukevich A. S. (2020). Ionospheric disturbances over eastern Siberia during April 12-15, 2016 geomagnetic storms. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 6(1), 60-68.
https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-61202007
61. entrk E. (2020). Investigation of global ionospheric response of the severe geomagnetic storm on June 22-23, 2015 by GNSS-based TEC observations. Astrophys. Space Sci., 365(7), 110.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-020-03828-z
62. Shpynev B. G., Zolotukhina N. A., Polekh N. M., Ratovsky K. G., Chernigovskaya M. A., Belinskaya A. Y., Stepanov A. E., Bychkov V. V., Grigorieva S. A., Panchenko V. A., Korenkova N. A., Mielich J. (2018). The ionosphere response to severe geomagnetic storm in March 2015 on the base of the data from Eurasian high-middle latitudes ionosonde chain. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 180, 93-105.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.10.014
63. Shreedevi P. R., Choudhary R. K., Thampi S. V., Yadav S., Pant T. K., Yu Y., McGranaghan R., Thomas E. G., Bhardwaj A., Sinha A. K. (2020). Geomagnetic storm-induced plasma density enhancements in the Southern Polar Ionospheric Region: A comparative study using St. Patrick's Day storms of 2013 and 2015. Space Weather, 18(8), e2019SW002383.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002383
64. Singh R., Scipion D., Kuyeng K., Patilongo P. J. C., De La Jara C., Velasquez J. P., Flores R., Ivan E. (2024). Ionospheric disturbances observed over the Peruvian sector during the Mother's Day Storm (G5-level) on May 10-12, 2024. ESS Open Archive.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033003
65. Spogli L., Alberti T., Bagiacchi P., Cafarella L., Cesaroni C., Cianchini G., Coco I., Di Mauro D., Ghidoni R., Giannattasio F., Ippolito A., Marcocci C., Pezzopane M., Pica E., Pignalberi A., Perrone L., Romano V., Sabbagh D., Scotto C., Spadoni S., Tozzi R., Viola M. (2024). The effects of the May 2024 Mother's Day superstorm over the Mediterranean sector: from data to public communication. Ann. Geophys., 67(2), PA218.
https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-9117
66. Spogli L., Sabbagh D., Regi M., Cesaroni C., Perrone L., Alfonsi L., Di Mauro D., Lepidi S., Campuzano S. A., Marchetti D., De Santis A., Malagnini A., Scotto C., Cianchini G., Shen X., Piscini A., Ippolito A. (2021). Ionospheric response over Brazil to the August 2018 geomagnetic storm as probed by CSES-01 and swarm satellites and by local ground-based observations. J. Geophys. Res., 126(2), e2020JA028368.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028368
67. Sun W.-J., Ning B.-Q., Zhao B.-Q., Li G.-Z., Hu L.-H., Chang S.-M. (2017). Analysis of ionospheric features in middle and low latitude region of China during the geomagnetic storm in March 2015. Acta geophys. sin., 60(1), 1-10.
68. Sur D., Ray S., Paul A. (2021). Impact of CME and HSSW driven geomagnetic storms on thermosphere and ionosphere as observed from midlatitudes. Adv. Space Res., 68(3), 1441-1460.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.03.027
69. Venkatesh K., Tulasi Ram S., Fagundes P. R., Seemala G. K., Batista I. S. (2017). Electrodynamic disturbances in the Brazilian equatorial and low-latitude ionosphere on St. Patrick's Day storm of 17 March 2015. J. Geophys. Res., 122(4), 4553-4570.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024009
70. Verkhoglyadova O. P., Komjathy A., Mannucci A. J., Mlynczak M. G., Hunt L. A., Paxton L. J. (2017). Revisiting ionosphere-thermosphere responses to solar wind driving in superstorms of November 2003 and 2004. J. Geophys. Res., 122(10), 10,824-10,850.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024542
71. Vijaya Lekshmi D., Balan N., Tulasi Ram S., Liu J. Y. (2011). Statistics of geomagnetic storms and ionospheric storms at low and mid latitudes in two solar cycles. J. Geophys. Res., 116(A11), A11328.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017042
72. Wang Z., Zou S., Liu L., Ren J., Aa E. (2021). Hemispheric Asymmetries in the Mid-latitude Ionosphere During the September 7/8, 2017 Storm: Multi-instrument Observations. J. Geophys. Res., 126(4), e2020JA028829.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028829
73. Wen D., Mei D. (2020). Ionospheric TEC disturbances over China during the strong geomagnetic storm in September 2017. Adv. Space Res., 65(11), 2529-2539.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.03.002
74. Willis D. M., Stevens P. R., Crothers S. R. (1997). Statistics of the largest geomagnetic storms per solar cycle (1844 - 1993). Ann. Geophys., 15(6), 719-728.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-997-0719-5
75. Xu Z., Hartinger M., Clauer C., Peek T., Behlke R. (2017). A comparison of the ground magnetic responses during the 2013 and 2015 St Patrick's Day geomagnetic storms. J. Geophys. Res., 122(4), 4023-4036.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023338
76. Zakharenkova I., Cherniak I., Krankowski A. (2019). Features of storm-induced ionospheric irregularities from ground-based and spaceborne GPS observations during the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm. J. Geophys. Res., 124(12), 10728-10748.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026782
77. Zhang S.-R., Erickson P. J., Zhang Y., Wang W., Huang C., Coster A. J., Holt J. M., Foster J. F., Sulzer M., Kerr R. (2017). Observations of ion-neutral coupling associated with strong electrodynamic disturbances during the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm. J. Geophys. Res., 122(1), 1314-1337.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023307
78. Zolotukhina N., Polekh N., Kurkin V., Rogov D., Romanova E., Chelpanov M. (2017). Ionospheric effects of St. Patrick's storm over Asian Russia: 17-19 March 2015. J. Geophys. Res., 122(2), 2484-2504.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023180