Determination of current density in magnetospheric plasma: Multispacecraft and particle approaches
Heading:
| 1Petrenko, BA, 1Kozak, LV, Khalimonenko, NO 1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Kinemat. fiz. nebesnyh tel (Online) 2026, 42(1):63-70 |
| https://doi.org/10.15407/kfnt2026.01.063 |
| Language: Ukrainian |
Abstract: A comparative analysis of two methods for determining electric current density in the near-Earth magnetospheric plasma is presented — the multispacecraft curlometer technique and the particle-based (kinetic) approach relying on plasma moments. The study is based on data from the Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission (MMS) for six magnetic reconnection events in Earth’s magnetotail observed between 2019 and 2024. It is shown that the results of both methods agree well under conditions of stable spacecraft configuration and the absence of radiation contamination in the measurements. The particle-based approach systematically yields overestimated current densities, likely due to locally enhanced ion concentrations near the spacecraft. Spectral analysis reveals that at frequencies above 1 Hz, particle-derived data exhibit increased noise levels. The obtained results are important for refining our understanding of energy dissipation mechanisms and the dynamics of magnetic reconnection processes. |
| Keywords: curlometer method, electric current density, magnetic reconnection, MMS, plasma moments |
References:
1. Burch J. L., Moore T. E., Torbert R. B., Giles B. H. (2016). Magnetospheric multiscale overview and science objectives. Space Sci. Revs, 199, 5-21.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0164-9
2. Dunlop M. W., Dong X. C., Wang T. Y., Eastwood J. P., Robert P., Haaland S., ... De Keyser J. (2021). Curlometer technique and applications. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 126(11).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029538
3. Dunlop M. W., Haaland S., Dong X. C., Middleton H. R., Escoubet C. P., Yang Y. Y., ... Russell C. T. (2018). Multipoint analysis of electric currents in geospace using the curlometer technique. Electric currents in geospace and beyond, 67-80.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119324522.ch4
4. Dunlop M. W., Southwood D. J., Glassmeier K. H., Neubauer F. M. (1988). Analysis of multipoint magnetometer data. Advances in Space Res., 8(9-10), 273-277.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(88)90141-X
5. Du C. X., Fu H. S., Cao J. B., Wang Z., Yu Y., Fu W. D., Zhang W. Z. (2024). Strong energy conversion at magnetotail plasma sheet boundary layer. Geophys. Res. Lett., 51(18), e2024GL111284.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111284
6. Petrenko B., Kozak L., Kronberg E., Akhmetshyn R. (2023a). Multispacecraft wave analysis of current sheet flapping motions in Earth's magnetotail. Front. Astron. and Space Sci., 9, 1071824
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.1071824
7. Pollock C., Moore T., Jacques A., Burch J., Gliese U., Saito Y., ... Zeuch M. (2016). Fast plasma investigation for magnetospheric multiscale. Space Sci. Revs, 199, 331- 406.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0245-4
8. Russell C. T., Anderson B. J., Baumjohann W., Bromund K. R., Dearborn D., Fischer D., et al. (2016). The magnetospheric multiscale magnetometers. Space Sci. Rev., 199(1-4), 189-256.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0057-3